Hindsight, they say, is 20/20. They…. are WRONG. Myopic policy makers and news pundits don’t see any better looking backward than they do looking forward. Since SARS-CoV-2 (henceforth the CCP virus) is THE black swan of the century, it is worth looking to those who called it first if you want to reconstruct a useful model of the past. Notable sources include: Zerohedge, Dr John Cambell, Gary North, Chris Martenson, Shrimp Zoo and others. I hope to add citations in the future but for now I just want to get the general timeline recorded.
Early January there were fleeting reports of a spike in viral pneumonia cases in China, a new Corona Virus. The West largely ignored these reports. One small exception was the prepper community and the perma-bears on Zerohedge. These niche communities are apt to seize on any possible threat and extrapolate the exact path it would take from point A to Apocalypse. In short, they behaved as expected and were dismissed as they usually are. The mainstream media covered these reports but felt the need to editorialize and draw comparisons to past non-outbreaks and conclude that there was nothing to fear. Towards the end of the month, these articles began to include admonishments to anyone questioning the official narrative and the dreaded R-word started to be tossed around as carelessly as ever. Curiously, the World Heath Organization echoed similar talking points: the virus did not exhibit person-to-person transmission, the virus is largely contained due to China’s exceptional control measures, anyone floating alternative theories or pointing fingers at China is being Racist. Curiouser still, these matched official Chinese talking points.
Here’s where things get nefarious. Chinese Communist Party (CCP) statements and WHO statements regarding the virus’s masterful containment by China’s brilliant response happened to coincide with large scale purchasing of medical equipment and personal protective equipment (PPE) across the globe by Chinese Interests. The WHO went so far as to say that wearing face masks or N95 respirators was “ineffective” for the general population in an attempt to help quell demand for such devices while the CCP was desperately scrounging all the masks they could. Western media parroted the WHO and CCP uncritically and for the most part, people went on with their lives
Some exceptions: South Korea and Taiwan. Taiwan is the most interesting, having been burned once before by Chinese lies regarding the 2003 SARS outbreak, they immediately implemented the following: testing at the borders, contact tracing, quarantine, social distancing, masks for everyone. Their economy slowed but they never implemented “lock downs”. They still haven’t.
Western media was focused on impeachment proceedings and the airtime devoted to CCP Virus coverage concerned the Diamond Princess Cruise ship. Cruise ship coverage made for good drama but the big questions around the virus weren’t being addressed.
Is it airborne (aerosolised)?
Are pre-symptomatic or asymptomatic carriers contagious?
What is the incubation time? 14 days? 20 days? more?
When working with an emerging global pandemic it would have been sensible to operate under the precautionary principle: assume the worst about this virus until proven otherwise. The WHO downplayed the severity and their answers were: no, no, 14 days. Initial reports suggested: yes, yes, 27 days. Western leaders and media makers alike minimized the threat by pointing to comfortingly low infection numbers in China. Two thousand deaths? That’s not even a ROUNDING ERROR in a population of 1.4 BILLION! Soon, cases began to mount in the US. The media narrative began to change again. Trump made much noise about closing borders, restricting inbound flights from Wuhan, but dismissed the virus as a distraction and seemed eager to focus on his strong economy which he was banking his 2020 re-election on. This opened him up to attack on two fronts: the media immediately cried RACISM because of the border restrictions and then began to report each additional case count with rising glee because it undermined his initial dismissal of the virus. They began to point at dire epidemiological models that forecast a 70% infection rate and millions dead. The pockets of conservative media that had not yet settled on an opinion of the virus took the bait. Fox News will never live down their initial reporting in which they attempted to protect the president by forcing the narrative that #it’sjustaflu. In the most bizarre turn of events, people who should have known better, willingly accepted CCP propaganda in order to dismiss the novel virus and by extension, criticism of the president.
And here’s where things get nefarious. The CDC actually came out and said that wearing face masks or N95 respirators was “ineffective” for the general population in an attempt to help quell demand for such devices while they were desperately scrounging all the masks they could for the US healthcare sector. History doesn’t repeat but it does rhyme…. What they MEANT to say was: “we made a HUGE error and let China buy up the world’s supply of masks and N95 respirators without reserving any for ourselves and because of that we are begging the American public to please stay home and don’t buy up the remaining masks.” The CDC made another egregious, albeit predictable error, and didn’t allow individual states or independent labs to develop their own CCP virus test kits until it was much too late. Predictably, cases mounted in tandem with deaths, doctors and nurses scrounged for PPE or went without, tests were unavailable for all but politicians and movie stars. US cases surpassed CCP reported cases, causing liberal pundits to break down in snarky fits of glee. The pressure to DO something was overwhelming. Locked Down. An apt term borrowed from our prison system. It seemed to be the only option available. Rapid testing and masks for everyone, the Taiwan response, would not be available to the freedom loving people of America. Those on the right found themselves on the defensive, but the liberty minded would retort that the extent to which a government-led response is mismanaged is directly proportional to the amount of government involvement. In short… only the naive should be surprised.
So that was looking back. And in doing so we are faced with some obvious questions. How did China know to shutdown it’s entire economy for 2 months and quarantine 2/3 of it’s population over a bug that ended up killing only 2,000 of it’s people? That’s incredible foresight… or maybe they knew more about this virus from the start than they are admitting. It’s impressive that they sequenced the virus 4 days after discovering it as the cause of an emerging epidemic of viral pneumonia. Very. Impressive. Maybe 2,000 dead isn’t such a believable figure either. This question deserves it’s own post.
The next question would have to be: Why did the US forgo a cheap response (masks and testing) in favor of a catastrophically expensive one (Economic suicide/lock down). Certainly one can make a believable argument for typical bureaucratic incompetence and lethargy as the culprits. However, that means that our leaders, armed with the best intelligence gathering apparatus in the world, chose to ignore the evidence from friends like Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore and Japan in favor of the propaganda claims from an enemy-China. Does this make sense? Here’s another thought: heads of state and heads of industry travel in similar circles. They talk. Heads of industry also have their own private intelligence services, typically former (sometimes current, shhh..) service members, to help them navigate the threats and opportunities of a rapidly changing world. It was very interesting that a record number of CEOs took the golden parachute option this January, with massive sales of their company stock on the way out. This question deserves it’s own post as well because it hinges on two very important conclusions: the global economy was doomed in 2020 without the virus and the global food supply is in jeopardy…